I think i know the answer to this question already since River is an SEO nut case lol but whats the point in spending money getting your site top for such a long time when you might as well buy traffic from google Adwords etc ? Doesnt seem logical when you have targetted traffic at your finger tips ?
lol thanks for that digger :tongue: Nothing wrong with PPC like adwords to start with mate but SEO is a long term solution which will eventually be more cost effective, Providing seo is done correctly anyway
I did some SEO for a company, just look at this and tell me what is the best. i - Before I seo their website, they spend about £900 per month on PPC ii. After I did SEO on their site, they spend £0.00 ON PPC and they get more traffic than they used to before PPC. I now charge then £150 per month just to tweak their website every month. So, if you were the owner of the above company, would you rather sticl to PPC or hire an SEO consultant?
Great way of putting it Temi , i also have a company who was exactly the same, I hardly have to touch their website any more but they are still savig money by having me on their books
you won't believe how many people take the position digger takes, a friend is working for a company as SEO guy, the company currently spend about £250,000 on PPC per year and he cannot convince them to spend only about £10,000 on organic link building, I told him to leave them and let them keep making Google richer if they won't give him budget just to buy some quality links
Thats Amazing , especially since the proof that this would be better for the company is so easily proved. I guess the people that deal with the advertising budget just dont really understand.
Yes, there is still a lot of ignorance about SEO, because PPC is instant, its appeal to human greed of instant gratification. With SEO you will not see result for about 3 months or so.
traffic from google adwords would cost u much higher and traffic from seo would cost quite lower and i would recommend not to hire webmaster for doing seo of ur website and instead u try to learn n do seo personally
Well let us see, it from a different prospective. SEO is a long term measure for your website. while short term measures includes, effective advertising, adwords etc. to drive traffic. So, you should try a combination of all of them to come up with a good satisfactory result.
ya SEO really worth's, Search engine optimization gives our site more traffic . it improves the level in search results, therefore more traffic to site comes and ultimately unlimited benefits to the our websites..... thanks, Brad Wilson
Of course, because i believe that an SEO spe******t can do a right strategies and tactics to improve and ranked a particular site. And we all know that these days a lot of competitors out there who would like to gain more traffic and wants to be in the 1st rank.
Of course SEO is worth it, if you want any one to visit your web site. And that is one of the reasons that most of use make a web site. sure you can spend lots of money on advertising but if you do your own SEO work it wont cost you anything. And you might learn something too.
Its good that you'll learn SEO personally but the problem is if your so busy dealing with what you really good at, with your business, that's the time that you really need someone to help you with the stuff. It is not bad at all if you will get somebody to do SEO for you
yes i agree with you , if you want to run your site on liong terms you have to do seo for your site , by your self or hire some one else if you can spend some extra bucks . But ppc and google adward just help you for that time when you are paying them after that you'r site automatically disappear or loose his major serp ranking ...
SEO doesn't just stop its a long term continuous process to ensure that you stay on the top. I find that some clients want to get to page 1, thats it job done, 6 month later shouting about still not being on page 1. You need to keep SEO going to maintain SERPs.
